Claude Code Proposal Review Mistakes: quick fix, steps, and deep guide

Q: Claude Code Proposal Review Mistakes

Treat this as a Upwork troubleshooting issue. Confirm the environment, inputs, permissions, logs, and delivery boundary, then use the linked deep guide for the full checklist.

What is the problem?

整理新手用 Claude Code 审阅 proposal 时的常见错误：直接发送 AI 初稿、过度承诺、不写未覆盖范围、暴露敏感信息、缺少客户追问。

Quick solution

Treat this as a Upwork troubleshooting issue. First confirm the environment, inputs, permissions, logs, and delivery boundary. Then use the linked deep guide for the full checklist before changing production code or promising a result.

Read the deep guide

Detailed steps

Confirm the scenario, tool version, account permissions, inputs, and expected output before changing anything.
Check configuration, logs, command output, and human review boundaries against the linked deep guide.
Record the before and after result, then verify that the fix did not introduce platform, privacy, or delivery risk.

Commands or code

我可以先做一轮低风险诊断，确认错误原因和下一步材料。当前信息还不足以承诺完整修复。本次不包含生产部署、真实数据、账号权限或长期维护。

Risk notes

Confirm the real project environment, account permissions, platform rules, and output quality before delivery. Do not ship AI-generated changes without human review, and do not claim indexing, income, deployment success, or ranking improvements without measured evidence.